Saturday, March 29, 2008

Why neither Obama nor Hillary will save you

Obama is a controlled puppet. So is Hillary.

The corruption in which the Clintons were involved is well documented. This includes a laundry list of political assassinations, including Vincent Foster. They are not strangers to false flag operations; the above link provides extensive documentation on how the Oklahoma City bombing was staged just like 9/11, which explains the confrontations of Hillary's husband with the 9/11 Truthers and his forceful denials.

Bill Clinton attended the well-known elitist Bilderberg group, as admitted by Hillary, although she denied insider reports that she attended in 2006. Bill Clinton is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. The CFR acts as a politburo for the Republicrats and pushes for world government and the North American Union, whilst AIPAC keeps US foreign policy favourable to Israel. And although I am not a fan of Chomsky since he dismissed the 9/11 Truth Movement, he documents very well in this article the ideology of the Trilateral Commission. And of course, Clinton voted for both the war in Iraq and the USA PATRIOT Act and voted for its reauthorisation in 2006.

Obama's record, contrarily to the claims of his fawning admirators, is hardly better. Despite his vote against the war in Iraq, Obama is not anti-war. He advocated surgical missile strikes on Iran, as pointed out in the Antiwar article. He advocated invading Pakistan on two occasions -- in 2004, in the event that 'violent Islamic extremists' take over, and recently, to strike Al CIAda on Pakistani territory, in violation of Pakistan's national sovereignty.

Like Clinton, he is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and panders to AIPAC, both of which pre-select US candidates and have a stranglehold on US foreign policy. Clearly, given the track record of Israel, supporting it in any way automatically disqualifies someone from any claim to being anti-war.

In addition Obama is supported by Zbigniew Brzezinski, who founded the Trilateral Commission and was responsible for funding the Mujahedeen (known today as Al CIAda) against the Soviets in Afghanistan.

Notwithstanding the inconvenient truths listed above, common sense would dictate that one should avoid the candidates who owe their popularity to being forced down people's throats by the media, the same media that sold the war in Iraq for the Bush regime and still promotes the official 9/11 propaganda in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence. The same media, also, which has used the dirtiest of tactics to censor non-anointed candidates like Ron Paul by rigging polls, as proven by this recording, and by making him disappear from graphs when he wins third place. The same media that achieved the Orwellian distinction of entertaining almost simultaneously the idea that Obama is both a radical Muslim and a racist black Christian. The convergence of interests between both allegedly independent parties and the corporate media became even more blatant when it was announced that Rupert Murdoch would raise funds for Clinton's campaign.

Now that no other candidates than Hillary, Obama and McCain have any chance of winning (as was predetermined since the beginning), those staged elections should be boycotted; doing otherwise will legitimise the control of the self-appointed elite and its facade democracy.